ArticleBMC medical education2025
The evolving landscape of oral biology education: a comparative study of teaching strategies.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the enormous changes in dental education to prepare well-trained dentists for future requirements, little is known about students' feedback and their perceptions of their curriculum. With respect to academic progress, bridging the gap between basic biological sciences and clinical studies has recently become one of the prominent approaches. However, the perspectives of medical students are not frequently considered during the revision of the medical curriculum. This study aims to investigate the influence of different oral biology and embryology teaching strategies on dental students' clinical awareness and practices.
methodsThis cross-sectional study provided a structured and anonymous online questionnaire to at least 222 currently registered dental students and dental alumni from various Egyptian universities. The questions referred to oral biology teaching methods, clinical relevance, the use of virtual microscopes, and the associations of oral biology and embryology with other subjects in the dental curriculum. The answers were collected, and the data were statistically analyzed.
resultsAccording to data, students strongly preferred modern teaching techniques over traditional ones, such as 3D holography and virtual microscopy. Most participants from both national and private universities expressed a strong preference for modern teaching techniques. The majority of participants in the study also concurred that oral biology topics are pertinent to clinical decision-making.
conclusionBy incorporating innovative technologies such as digital scanned slides, virtual microscopy, and holography, dental institutions can boost the educational process, especially the online process, and equip future dentists with essential skills for clinical excellence. Perpetual evaluation of teaching strategies is crucial for optimizing student engagement and ensuring the effectiveness of these advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.