ArticleBMC public health2025
Association between lifestyle factors and liver function parameters in the middle-aged and older population.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing evidence supports a higher risk of abnormal liver function parameters due to unfavorable lifestyles. We therefore explored the synergistic effects of various lifestyle factors on liver function.
methods8710 participants from Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study were included. Five lifestyle factors including non-smoking, non-alcohol use, physically active, non-central and non-general obesity were assessed and a Healthy Lifestyle Index (HLI) (0-5, a higher score indicates healthier lifestyle) was generated. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association of HLI with liver function parameters, yielding regression coefficients (βs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
resultsA total of 8710 participants with an average age of 64.67 years (standard deviation = 6.07) were included. Of them, 71.65% were women. After adjusting for sex, age, education, family income, and comorbidities, compared with those with HLI of zero, those with HLI scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 showed a lower ALT level by -5.85 IU/L (95% CI: -10.73, -0.97), -9.97 IU/L (95% CI: -14.53, -5.42), -11.34 IU/L(95% CI: -15.86, -6.82), -12.81 IU/L (95% CI: -17.33, -8.30), and - 14.15 IU/L (95% CI: -18.68, -9.62), respectively (P for trend < 0.001), and a lower AST level by 1.82 IU/L (95% CI: -4.85,1.21), -3.74 IU/L (95% CI: -6.57, -0.91), -4.47 IU/L (95% CI: -7.28, -1.66), -4.69 IU/L (95% CI: -7.49, -1.88), and - 4.75 IU/L (95% CI: -7.57, -1.94), respectively (P for trend < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for a higher ALB level with higher healthy lifestyle scores (P for trend = 0.003).
conclusionsA healthy lifestyle was associated with optimal liver function parameters, highlighting the importance of advocating for health-conscious behaviors to potentially mitigate the incidence of liver dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.