ArticleBMC nursing2025
Comparison of simulation-based and online-based anaphylaxis training for improving the emergency competencies of elementary school nurses: a quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Digital Health into School Nursing for Food Allergy Management: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe potential for life-threatening allergic reactions in elementary schoolchildren has emerged as a major problem. There are, however, concerns about whether school nurses have the necessary competencies to respond to such emergency situations. This study developed simulation-based anaphylaxis training (SBAT) and online-based anaphylaxis training (OBAT) programs and compared their efficacy for improving elementary school nurses' competencies in emergencies involving life-threatening anaphylactic events.
methodsThis is a quasi-experimental study. The sample comprised 40 and 47 elementary school nurses placed in the SBAT and OBAT groups, respectively. The effects of the intervention were analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
resultsThe pre-post differences were significantly higher in the SBAT group compared to the OBAT group in terms of knowledge (1.97 ± 1.21 vs. 0.87 ± 1.37; p < 0.001), self-efficacy (7.50 ± 6.37 vs. 3.42 ± 4.47, p = 0.005), perceived performance competency in emergency care (4.11 ± 3.73 vs. - 0.76 ± 3.40; p < 0.001), and critical thinking (7.02 ± 10.36 vs. 2.40 ± 8.03, p = 0.031). A within-group comparison of the SBAT group showed that all outcome measures significantly improved (p < 0.001). However, in the OBAT group, only knowledge (p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (p < 0.001) significantly improved from the pretest.
conclusionsCompared with OBAT, the SBAT program was more suitable for enhancing the perceived performance competency and critical thinking of elementary school nurses in emergency anaphylactic care. Therefore, school nursing trainers are advised to incorporate SBAT into continuing education programs for school nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.