Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420070›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Sustainability in the operating room: a cross-sectional survey of nurse anaesthetists' and operating room nurses' views and practice.

Fiona M Flynn, Susanne Skard Martinsen, Frida Øiseth, Jill Flo, Ann-Chatrin Linqvist Leonardsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Sustainability: the role of the Surgical Center.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona M FlynnDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Campus Vestfold, Norway. fiona.flynn@usn.no.
Susanne Skard MartinsenØstfold Hospital Trust, Halden, Norway.
Frida ØisethØstfold Hospital Trust, Halden, Norway.
Jill FloDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Campus Vestfold, Norway.
Ann-Chatrin Linqvist LeonardsenDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Campus Vestfold, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe healthcare sector is responsible for between 4.4% and 5.2% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and the operating room accounts for 20-30% of hospital waste. Healthcare personnel have a responsibility to develop sustainable healthcare services that reduce waste and pollutants discharged into the environment. Nurse anaesthetists and operating room nurses can play a key role in ensuring sustainable practice in the operating room. The study's aim was to (1) explore their views and practice regarding climate change, the healthcare sector's carbon footprint, and sustainable practice in the operating room, (2) assess differences in the way in which the two professions regard these issues, and (3) assess factors which potentially are associated with participants' views and practice.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in three hospital trusts in south-eastern Norway between October 2023 and January 2024. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, independent t-tests and Chi-square analyses. Thematic analysis was used for free-text responses.

resultsA total of 110 nurse anaesthetists and 88 operating room nurses participated in the survey (response rate = 31%). Almost all participants (96.9%) agreed that the world is facing a climate change crisis. There were significant differences (p < 0.001) between the two professions' views regarding the individual's responsibility in reducing the healthcare sector's carbon footprint. There was also a significant difference in their views regarding whether the health institution provided training to promote sustainable practice (p < 0.001). Both professions recycled waste materials, but there was a significant difference regarding the perceived need for recycling systems (p = 0.03). Three themes emerged from the free-text responses: 'a need for education and information', 'increasing awareness' and 'lack of organisational measures' regarding participants' perspectives on climate, health and sustainability in the operating room.

conclusionsDespite certain differences in their views and a perceived lack of awareness, information and organisational measures, this study shows that nurse anaesthetists and operating room nurses are concerned about reducing the operating room's carbon footprint. However, they have the potential to play a more active role in greening the operating room by participating in grassroot strategies that foster sustainability. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Carbon footprintClimate changeDrug residuesNurse anaesthetistOperating room nurseRecyclingSurveyWaste reduction

Identifiers

PMID40420070
PMCPMC12107790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.