ArticleBMC medical education2025
An undergraduate experimental research program, involving the screening of efflux pump inhibitors, to improve student research skills in biomedical science.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges in bioinformatics education courses organization.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Participating in scientific research is essential for undergraduate students that major in biotechnology, public health, biomedical science, and medical laboratory technology to develop their research skill. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) represent a transformative pedagogical approach that integrates authentic research projects into conventional curricula. However, a systematic experimental training system is lacking. Here, we present the Antimicrobial Resistance-focused Pharmaceutical Developing Research (APDR) program, which broadly covers multiple courses and key topics, such as microorganism isolation and identification, drug sensitivity detection, protein expression and homology modeling, and molecular docking and new drug screening, with the potential for publishable research outcomes. Students enrolled in this program mastered various research skills and demonstrated a 2.4-fold increase in published articles per capita compared with those not enrolled in this program. Significant improvements in follow-up course scores in genetic engineering (18.5%), microbiology (6.9%), and molecular biology (10.7%) were observed among participants. Furthermore, 44.1% of participants demonstrated scholarly productivity as exemplified by authored or co-authored publications. Therefore, a systematic APDR program offers students a positive learning experience to enhance students' research skills. and provides a pedagogical tool that can be adapted to improve students' ability to engage in biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.