ArticleBMC genomics2025
A Mg
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection: A Mg2025
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe isolation of intact, high-molecular-weight genomic DNA (HMW gDNA) is essential for achieving complete genome assemblies. However, extracting HMW gDNA from a single individual of Dugesia japonica remains a technical challenge using the standard protocol, probably due to the presence of abundant polysaccharides and nucleases.
resultsIn this study, we have developed a more robust protocol for preparing HMM gDNA, with high yields and quality, from a single D. japonica. The key step in our protocol involves the use of a Mg
conclusionsThis protocol offers a simple and high-yield solution for isolating HMW gDNA from D. japonica. It also provides an alternative for organisms whose gDNA consistently exhibits unexplained degradation using established protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.