Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420050›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Clinical, radiological, and radiomics feature-based explainable machine learning models for prediction of neurological deterioration and 90-day outcomes in mild intracerebral hemorrhage.

Weixiong Zeng, Jiaying Chen, Linling Shen, Genghong Xia, Jiahui Xie, Shuqiong Zheng, Zilong He, Limei Deng, Yaya Guo, Jingjing Yang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Weixiong Zeng *Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaying Chen *Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Linling Shen *Department of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Genghong XiaDepartment of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiahui XieDepartment of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuqiong ZhengDepartment of Psychiatry, Sleep Medicine Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zilong HeDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Limei DengDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yaya GuoDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jingjing YangDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yijun LvDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Genggeng QinDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiguo ChenDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. chen1999@smu.edu.cn.
Jia YinDepartment of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. yinj@smu.edu.cn.
Qiheng WuDepartment of Neurology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. cris0087@qq.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171317National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171929National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515010477President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University 2023A007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risks and prognosis of mild intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients were easily overlooked by clinicians. Our goal was to use machine learning (ML) methods to predict mild ICH patients' neurological deterioration (ND) and 90-day prognosis.

methodsThis prospective study recruited 257 patients with mild ICH for this study. After exclusions, 148 patients were included in the ND study and 144 patients in the 90-day prognosis study. We trained five ML models using filtered data, including clinical, traditional imaging, and radiomics indicators based on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). Additionally, we incorporated the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) method to display key features and visualize the decision-making process of the model for each individual.

resultsA total of 21 (14.2%) mild ICH patients developed ND, and 35 (24.3%) mild ICH patients had a 90-day poor prognosis. In the validation set, the support vector machine (SVM) models achieved an AUC of 0.846 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.627-1.000) and an F1-score of 0.667 for predicting ND, and an AUC of 0.970 (95% CI, 0.928-1.000), and an F1-score of 0.846 for predicting 90-day prognosis. The SHAP analysis results indicated that several clinical features, the island sign, and the radiomics features of the hematoma were of significant value in predicting ND and 90-day prognosis.

conclusionThe ML models, constructed using clinical, traditional imaging, and radiomics indicators, demonstrated good classification performance in predicting ND and 90-day prognosis in patients with mild ICH, and have the potential to serve as an effective tool in clinical practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRadiomicsSupport Vector MachineComputed tomographyIntracerebral hemorrhageMachine learningModified rankin scaleNeurological deteriorationRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40420050
PMCPMC12105149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.