ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Automatic assessment of lower limb deformities using high-resolution X-ray images.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating the Effect of Center of Rotation of Angulation (CORA) Location on Varus Knee Joint Mechanics.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlanning an osteotomy or arthroplasty surgery on a lower limb requires prior classification/identification of its deformities. The detection of skeletal landmarks and the calculation of angles required to identify the deformities are traditionally done manually, with measurement accuracy relying considerably on the experience of the individual doing the measurements. We propose a novel, image pyramid-based approach to skeletal landmark detection.
methodsThe proposed approach uses a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that receives the raw X-ray image as input and produces the coordinates of the landmarks. The landmark estimations are modified iteratively via the error feedback method to come closer to the target. Our clinically produced full-leg X-Rays dataset is made publically available and used to train and test the network. Angular quantities are calculated based on detected landmarks. Angles are then classified as lower than normal, normal or higher than normal according to predefined ranges for a normal condition.
resultsThe performance of our approach is evaluated at several levels: landmark coordinates accuracy, angles' measurement accuracy, and classification accuracy. The average absolute error (difference between automatically and manually determined coordinates) for landmarks was 0.79 ± 0.57 mm on test data, and the average absolute error (difference between automatically and manually calculated angles) for angles was 0.45 ± 0.42°.
conclusionsResults from multiple case studies involving high-resolution images show that the proposed approach outperforms previous deep learning-based approaches in terms of accuracy and computational cost. It also enables the automatic detection of the lower limb misalignments in full-leg x-ray images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.