ArticleBMC public health2025
The association between solid fuel use for heating and cooking and low back pain and neck pain in middle-aged to elderly Chinese adults: a cross-sectional and panel data analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can the use of solid fuels increase the burden of multisite pain among middle-aged and older adults in China?Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn low - and middle-income countries, a large number of people still use solid fuels, including crop residues such as biofuels/wood and coal, for heating and cooking. Compared with clean fuels(electric, liquefied petroleum gas, natural gas, marsh gas and solar), solid fuels can cause numerous health hazards. There is limited evidence suggesting that the use of solid fuel is associated with self-perceived low back pain (LBP) and neck pain (NP). This study aimed to analyze the association between household solid fuel use and the risk of LBP and NP in middle aged and elderly adults.
methodsWe used data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study for five cross-sectional and ten panel analyses. Multivariable logistic regression model and generalized estimation equation were used to elucidate the relationship between solid fuel and the number of solid fuels used and two pains(LBP and NP). Moreover, the effect of fuel type conversion on LBP and NP is also done.
resultsThe results indicate that users of solid fuels, particularly those using solid cooking fuels, may have a higher risk of LBP(OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.05-1.22 for 2011-2020) and NP(OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.31 for 2018-2020). The use of solid fuels for heating also raises the risk of LBP(OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.06-1.24 for 2011-2020) and NP(OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.46 for 2015-2020). Compared to complete clean fuel users, both mixed fuel and complete solid fuel users face a greater risk for LBP (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.17-1.43 for complete solid fuel users) and NP(OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22-1.55 for complete solid fuel users). Additionally, persistent solid fuel users and those who switch fuel types exhibit higher risks of LBP (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.20-1.47 for persistent solid fuel heating; OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.26-1.54 for persistent solid fuel cooking) and NP (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.20-1.59 for persistent solid fuel heating; OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.17-1.54 for persistent solid fuel cooking) than persistent clean fuel users.
conclusionLong-term exposure to household solid fuels is associated with a higher risk of LBP and NP. It is suggested that multiple departments cooperate to increase the global use of clean energy and thereby reduce the risk of LBP and NP among middle-aged and elderly people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.