ArticleBMC neurology2025
A telemedicine tool for acute stroke management in Malaysia: a smartphone application.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assessment of stroke severity, precise neuroimaging diagnosis, and seamless coordination among stakeholders are crucial in ensuring prompt diagnosis and treatment during acute stroke activation. The study aimed to assess how the telestroke tool JOIN enhances time metrics in acute stroke care, specifically by improving decision-making speed and thereby enhancing patients' clinical outcomes.
methodsThis prospective cohort study was conducted at Seberang Jaya Hospital and Umum Sarawak Hospital in Malaysia. It included adult ischaemic stroke patients who arrived within 4.5 h of stroke onset at one of the two locations. Patients were divided into two groups: the pre-JOIN period using conventional communication versus the JOIN period using JOIN. Time metrics were collected from medical records and/or social networking services (pre-JOIN), and timestamp data (JOIN). Analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, with a total sample size of 120 patients.
resultsWith 60 patients in each group (pre-JOIN and JOIN), the mean (SD) ages were 57 (12.6) and 60 (14.1) respectively. Patients in both groups were similar at baseline, showing comparable stroke subtypes, events, and severity, primarily Lacunar Anterior Circulation Infarct with mild stroke as their initial occurrence. Both median door-to-imaging time and door-to-decision time were reduced by 6 min with JOIN, although the difference was not statistically significant. Thrombolysis rates and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages were similar between groups, but door-to-needle time was significantly shorter with JOIN (78 [28.0] minutes versus 45 [42.0] minutes, p = 0.008). Most patients were discharged alive with similar modified Rankin Scale scores between the groups.
conclusionsDoor-to-needle time was shorter in the post-JOIN period than in the pre-JOIN period, suggesting that the implementation of JOIN may contribute to improved time metrics in acute stroke care. Its safety, affordability, ease of use, and additional features make it a promising telestroke tool, crucial for handling high patient volumes with limited resources.
trial registrationThis study was registered with the Malaysian National Medical Research Register and received ethical approval (NMRR ID-21-02363-XFT) from the Medical Research and Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health Malaysia dated 30-March-2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.