Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420001›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Perceived usability, acceptability, and feasibility of stool-based qPCR TB diagnostics: perspectives from healthcare providers in Manhiça District, southern Mozambique.

Agostinho Viana Lima, Sozinho Acácio, Hermínio Cossa, Sabine Hermans, Alexander Kay, Willy Ssengooba, Anna Mandalakas, Christoph Lange, Alberto Garcia-Basteiro, Khátia Munguambe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Agostinho Viana LimaCentro de Investigação Em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique. agostinho.lima@manhica.net.
Sozinho AcácioCentro de Investigação Em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Hermínio CossaCentro de Investigação Em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Sabine HermansDepartment of Global Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alexander KayBaylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Willy SsengoobaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Makerere University, Lung Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Anna MandalakasBaylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Christoph LangeResearch Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany.
Alberto Garcia-BasteiroCentro de Investigação Em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Khátia MunguambeCentro de Investigação Em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Stool4 TB Global Partnership

Funding

Developing Clinical Prediction Tools to Define Strategies for Differentiated Service Delivery in Children and Adolescents Living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.K01TW011482 · FIC · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KAY, ALEXANDER WILLIAM · 2020 to 2024
$749k
EDCTP2 programme RIA2018D-2511-Stool4TBFIC NIH HHS K01 TW011482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStool-based qPCR TB diagnostics (S-qPCR TBD) are reported to contribute to increased rates of bacteriological confirmation in children and people living with HIV. However, there is still limited literature on the usability, acceptability, and feasibility of S-qPCR TBD in countries with high TB burden. This study aimed to assess healthcare providers' perspectives on usability and perceived barriers and facilitators to the uptake of S-qPCR TBD.

methodsThis generic qualitative study was conducted across five health facilities and four communities within the Manhiça District (Mozambique). Twenty-one semi-structured interviews combined with direct observations were conducted with HPs from February 2022 to March 2023. The interviews were transcribed, coded using an Excel matrix, and analyzed using the Diffusion of Innovation theory and the socioecological framework.

resultsThe findings suggest that HPs view S-qPCR TBD as easy to perform and beneficial for patients who struggle with sputum production. Intrapersonal factors, such as prior experiences with biological sampling procedures, traumatic experiences with invasive procedures, and understanding of clinical outcomes, are crucial factors positively influencing acceptability. Institutional factors, namely, the clarity of information about S-qPCR TBD, and community factors, such as collaboration between community leaders and health services to facilitate patient referral, were also identified as critical. Societal factors, such as the definition of national guidelines, also play a role. However, potential barriers were identified. These include intrapersonal factors like level of education, employment, distance to health facilities, lack of experience with Stool-based Procedures, and misconceptions about and fears of handling stools. Institutional challenges, such as a lack of clear explanation of the technique, as well as resources and training, delays in consumable replenishment, and machine breakdowns, could also hinder acceptance. Local beliefs about TB transmission also play a role as community-level factors.

conclusionsWhile HPs consider S-qPCR TBD as beneficial and easy to perform, acceptability may be compromised by factors such as patients' characteristics, health services challenges, lack of awareness about the S-qPCR TBD, and misconceptions about stool samples and TB. To promote acceptability, the study suggests disseminating information about TB and S-qPCR TBD, improving trust in health services, and fostering collaboration between the health sector and community actors.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFecesHealth PersonnelReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTuberculosisAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMozambiqueMycobacterium tuberculosisQualitative ResearchDiagnosisFeasibility and acceptabilityStoolTuberculosesUsability

Identifiers

PMID40420001
PMCPMC12107822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.