ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Auto-segmentation of cerebral cavernous malformations using a convolutional neural network.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive collaborative feature fusion and shape-aware optimization for multi-scale chest lesion detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis paper presents a deep learning model for the automated segmentation of cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs).
methodsThe model was trained using treatment planning data from 199 Gamma Knife (GK) exams, comprising 171 cases with a single CCM and 28 cases with multiple CCMs. The training data included initial MRI images with target CCM regions manually annotated by neurosurgeons. For the extraction of data related to the brain parenchyma, we employed a mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN). Subsequently, this data was processed using a 3D convolutional neural network known as DeepMedic.
resultsThe efficacy of the brain parenchyma extraction model was demonstrated via five-fold cross-validation, resulting in an average Dice similarity coefficient of 0.956 ± 0.002. The segmentation models used for CCMs achieved average Dice similarity coefficients of 0.741 ± 0.028 based solely on T2W images. The Dice similarity coefficients for the segmentation of CCMs types were as follows: Zabramski Classification type I (0.743), type II (0.742), and type III (0.740). We also developed a user-friendly graphical user interface to facilitate the use of these models in clinical analysis.
conclusionsThis paper presents a deep learning model for the automated segmentation of CCMs, demonstrating sufficient performance across various Zabramski classifications.
trial registrationnot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.