Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40419984›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025

Bridging the gap between scientists and clinicians: addressing collaboration challenges in clinical AI integration.

Mia Gisselbaek, Joana Berger-Estilita, Arnout Devos, Pierre Luigi Ingrassia, Peter Dieckmann, Sarah Saxena

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. AI for scientific discovery is a social problem.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mia Gisselbaek *Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joana Berger-Estilita *Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Arnout DevosETH AI Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), Zürich, Switzerland.
Pierre Luigi IngrassiaCentro di Simulazione (CeSi), Centro Professionale Sociosanitario Medico-Tecnico, Lugano, Switzerland.
Peter DieckmannCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Capital Region of Denmark, Herlev, Denmark.
Sarah SaxenaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Helora, Mons, Belgium. sarahksaxena@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores challenges for bridging the gap between scientists and healthcare professionals in artifical intelligence (AI) integration. It highlights barriers, the role of interdisciplinary research centers, and the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Collaboration, education, and ethical AI development are essential for optimizing AI's impact in perioperative medicine.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCooperative BehaviorHealth PersonnelResearch PersonnelHumansAIArtificial intelligenceDEIEducation

Identifiers

PMID40419984
PMCPMC12105364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.