ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Development of time to event prediction models using federated learning.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Application and challenges of the clinical decision support system in hematological diseases].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Review
- Refining the risk stratification in advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A critical analysis of clinical prediction models.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn a wide range of diseases, it is necessary to utilize multiple data sources to obtain enough data for model training. However, performing centralized pooling of multiple data sources, while protecting each patients' sensitive data, can require a cumbersome process involving many institutional bodies. Alternatively, federated learning (FL) can be utilized to train models based on data located at multiple sites.
methodWe propose two methods for training time-to-event prediction models based on distributed data, relying on FL algorithms, for time-to-event prediction models. Both approach incorporates steps to allow prediction of individual-level survival curves, without exposing individual-level event times. For Cox proportional hazards models, the latter is accomplished by using a kernel smoother for the baseline hazard function. The other proposed methodology is based on general parametric likelihood theory for right-censored data. We compared these two methods in four simulation and with one real-world dataset predicting the survival probability in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).
resultsThe simulations demonstrated that the FL models performed similarly to the non-distributed case in all four experiments, with only slight deviations in predicted survival probabilities compared to the true model. Our findings were similar in the real-world advanced-stage HL example where the FL models were compared to their non-distributed versions, revealing only small deviations in performance.
conclusionThe proposed procedures enable training of time-to-event models using data distributed across sites, without direct sharing of individual-level data and event times, while retaining a predictive performance on par with undistributed approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.