Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40419965›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025

Development of time to event prediction models using federated learning.

Rasmus Rask Kragh Jørgensen, Jonas Faartoft Jensen, Tarec El-Galaly, Martin Bøgsted, Rasmus Froberg Brøndum, Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Lasse Hjort Jakobsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rasmus Rask Kragh JørgensenDepartment of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. Rasmus.rask@rn.dk.ORCID 0009-0000-7249-2196
Jonas Faartoft JensenDepartment of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Tarec El-GalalyDepartment of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin BøgstedCenter for Clinical Data Science, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Rasmus Froberg BrøndumCenter for Clinical Data Science, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Mikkel Runason SimonsenDepartment of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lasse Hjort JakobsenDepartment of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

Danish Data Science Academy NNF21SA006942Villum Fonden 40516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a wide range of diseases, it is necessary to utilize multiple data sources to obtain enough data for model training. However, performing centralized pooling of multiple data sources, while protecting each patients' sensitive data, can require a cumbersome process involving many institutional bodies. Alternatively, federated learning (FL) can be utilized to train models based on data located at multiple sites.

methodWe propose two methods for training time-to-event prediction models based on distributed data, relying on FL algorithms, for time-to-event prediction models. Both approach incorporates steps to allow prediction of individual-level survival curves, without exposing individual-level event times. For Cox proportional hazards models, the latter is accomplished by using a kernel smoother for the baseline hazard function. The other proposed methodology is based on general parametric likelihood theory for right-censored data. We compared these two methods in four simulation and with one real-world dataset predicting the survival probability in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

resultsThe simulations demonstrated that the FL models performed similarly to the non-distributed case in all four experiments, with only slight deviations in predicted survival probabilities compared to the true model. Our findings were similar in the real-world advanced-stage HL example where the FL models were compared to their non-distributed versions, revealing only small deviations in performance.

conclusionThe proposed procedures enable training of time-to-event models using data distributed across sites, without direct sharing of individual-level data and event times, while retaining a predictive performance on par with undistributed approaches.

Indexed as

Federated LearningHodgkin DiseaseModels, StatisticalComputer SimulationHumansProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID40419965
PMCPMC12105200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.