Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40419897›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

The impact of educational attainment on gestational diabetes mellitus is mediated by body mass index: A Mendelian randomization study.

Shengjiao Zhu, Ruifeng Gui, Jiao Mu, Kun Tong, Guoqiang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shengjiao ZhuHuanggang Central Hospital, Huanggang, Hubei, PR China.
Ruifeng Gui
Jiao Mu
Kun Tong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy complication associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. While numerous studies have investigated the factors influencing GDM, the relationship between educational attainment and the GDM risk remains less explored. This study employs a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to estimate the causal relationship between educational attainment, as a proxy for socioeconomic inequality, and the risk of GDM, and to quantify the roles of body mass index (BMI) as a potential mediator. We performed a two-sample MR study of genetically predicted educational attainment (instrumented using 1271 variants from 766,345 individuals) and gestational diabetes mellitus (116,363 individuals) using the largest genome-wide association studies. We used a two-step MR to quantify the proportion of education's effect on GDM mediated by BMI (681,275 individuals). Each standard deviation increase in educational attainment (4.2 years of schooling) was protective of GDM (odds ratios: 0.67; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.59, 0.76). Higher educational attainment was also protective for BMI [β = -0.27 standard deviation (~1.3 kg/m2); 95% CI: -0.32, -0.22]. BMI mediated 35% (95% CI: 25%, 46%) of the total effect of education on GDM. Higher educational attainment has a protective effect on GDM risk. Interventions to reduce excess adiposity at the population level may reduce this risk, but the effect of education on GDM remains largely unexplained. Further investigation is necessary to identify additional risk factors that function as potentially modifiable mediators.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexDiabetes, GestationalEducational StatusAdultFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisPregnancyRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factorsbody mass indexeducational attainmentgestational diabetes mellitusmediationmendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID40419897
PMCPMC12113916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.