ReviewMedicine2025
Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and additional surgeries: A review.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Outcomes and Biomechanical Considerations of Graft Selection-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) failure is caused by medical and nonmedical factors. A thorough preoperative evaluation should include knowledge of previous injuries, physical examination, and imaging. Classic tunnel management techniques include divergent drilling technique, transtibial technique, anteromedial portal technique, outside-in technique, and over-the-top technique. Although critical tunnel widening or overlap usually requires 2-stage revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR), efforts have been made to perform 1-stage revision ACLR in these cases. Bone grafts include bone autografts and bone allografts, synthetic bone grafts, and biologics. Grafts include autografts, allografts, and artificial ligaments. Extra-articular augmentation benefits revision ACLR in selected individuals. Varus knee and excessive posterior tibial slope should be addressed in some cases. Meniscus injury and articular cartilage injury should be addressed. Although the overall outcomes of revision ACLR are worse than those of primary ACLR, revision ACLR remains important for improving knee function and return to sport. Future research should expand the indications for 1-stage revision, clarify the indications of anterior closing wedge high tibial osteotomy and extra-articular augmentation at the time of revision ACLR, based on strong evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.