Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40419823›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025

The effects of biotic treatments on degradation of antimicrobials and coccidiostats in broiler litter used as ruminant feed.

Solomon Efriem, Sameer J Mabjeesh, Chris Sabastian, Malka Britzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Solomon EfriemThe Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel.
Sameer J MabjeeshThe Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel. sameer.mabjeesh@mail.huji.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-3062
Chris SabastianThe Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot, 7610001, Israel.
Malka BritziNational Residue Control Laboratory, Kimron Veterinary Institute, 5025001, Beit Dagan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While broiler litter (BL) represents a valuable protein source for ruminant feed, the presence of pharmaceutical residues poses significant concerns for food safety and antimicrobial resistance. Previous research has primarily focused on composting and aerobic digestion of BL, leaving a critical knowledge gap regarding the comparative efficacy of economically viable treatment methods. This study presents the first systematic comparison of three cost-effective treatments-stacking, aerobic, and anaerobic processing-specifically analyzing their impacts on pharmaceutical compound degradation in BL intended for ruminant feed. Using LC/MS/MS analysis, we evaluated the degradation patterns of 29 antimicrobials and coccidiostats under controlled conditions, while simultaneously monitoring key parameters including temperature kinetics, pH fluctuations, short-chain volatile fatty acids (SCVFA), and nutritional content. Our findings revealed that stacking treatment demonstrated superior degradation efficiency for most compounds, achieving > 95% degradation for key antimicrobials and 54.9-74.7% for commonly used coccidiostats. Notably, the stacking method maintained optimal crude protein levels (32-34.8%) while reducing moisture content by 29.5-34.6%. Temperature profiles showed distinct patterns: aerobic treatment reached 60 °C within 24 h, while stacking achieved 50 °C over 2 weeks, both significantly outperforming anaerobic treatment (38 °C). This research provides the first comparative evidence for selecting cost-effective BL treatment methods, offering practical guidelines for agricultural operations to minimize pharmaceutical residues while preserving nutritional value for ruminant feed.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnti-Infective AgentsCoccidiostatsAnimalsChickensCompostingRuminantsAnti-Infective AgentsCoccidiostatsAntimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobialsBroiler litterCoccidiostatsLC/MS/MSShort-chain volatile fatty acids (SCVFA)

Identifiers

PMID40419823
PMCPMC12202678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.