SynthesisEvidence-based dentistry2025
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of orthodontists regarding orthodontic treatment of traumatized teeth: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Evidence-based dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the global status of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of orthodontists regarding the orthodontic treatment of traumatized teeth.
methodsAn a priori protocol was developed and registered (PROSPERO, CRD42022342038). The literature search based on the Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO) elements of the research question was developed and conducted electronically in PubMed, LILACS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, up to 31st August 2024. Gray literature and reference searches were also performed. Titles and abstracts were screened, and later, full-text articles were identified. Data extraction and analysis were performed, and the risk of bias was analyzed via the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for cross-sectional analytical studies. The data was synthesized in form of tables and interpretation was performed.
resultsFrom a total of 1272 articles initially identified, six studies qualified for the final synthesis. The awareness of orthodontic treatment of teeth with root fractures, crown fractures, crown‒root fractures, mild and severe injury to the periodontium, and teeth managed by revascularization and root canal treatment was found to be less than 40% in most of the studies. Awareness regarding the risk of resorption in teeth with external inflammatory root resorption and avoiding forces on teeth with ankylosis was greater than 90%. The risk of bias was found to be low in three studies.
conclusionsThe knowledge of orthodontists regarding most aspects of orthodontic management of traumatized teeth was found to be low or inadequate. There are wide variations in the protocols preferred, which differ from contemporary recommendations and evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40419782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.