ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving national-scale breeding bird surveys with integrated distance sampling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bird population estimation over broad spatial and temporal scales is a key objective in ornithology. To date, bird ecologists mainly relied on standard point counts where the number of detected individuals is interpreted as either the true abundance or proportionally related to it. However, providing accurate estimates of species abundance requires modelling the observation process with temporally replicated data, which is not always possible with the increasing use of ever-bigger datasets from citizen science programs. Data integration methods allow combining temporally replicated sampling at coarser spatial grains with data collected over larger spatial extents. Here, we developed an Integrated distance sampling (IDS) to combine national structured and semi-structured citizen-based bird surveys in France to estimate species abundances using observation distances and accounting for availability, i.e. the probability of individuals being detectable during a given sampling visit. While our simulation study showed an overall increase in the accuracy of estimated parameters for both ecological and observation processes, without significant biases, our case study suggests that such model improvements will depend on specific sampling scenarios. Integrated models represent a promising tool for ecological science, permitting the joint use of large unstructured datasets with scale-restricted structured surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.