ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
A systematic review of clinicians' acceptance and use of clinical decision support systems over time.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented Reality-Guided Decision Support in Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Impacts of a Statewide Prescription Drug Monitoring Program-Healthcare Practitioner Perspectives.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Usability and Quality of UCISAB, a Clinical Decision Support System for Optimization of Analgesia and Sedation Infusions in the ICU: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Usability Evaluation in Colombia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Decision Mining Tool for Nursing Quality Improvement by Hospital Nurses: Theory-Guided Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the implementation of a clinical decision support system for substance use disorder screening in maternal healthcare.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- Why integration, not innovation, is the real-world challenge facing digital health.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Implementation of Electronic Clinical Decision Support for Radiology Referrals: The Role of Governance, Clinician Engagement and Education.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Therapist perspectives on the clinical utility of hand performance information from at-home egocentric video in outpatient neurorehabilitation: a multi-methods evaluation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making in medicine: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Intelligent Reasoning Cues: A Framework and Case Study of the Roles of AI Information in Complex Decisions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026Article
- Article
- Experiences of Alert Fatigue and Its Contributing Factors in Hospitals: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Assessing Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of a New System in Clinical Workflows: Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety-Based Consensual Qualitative Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for predicting and preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes addressing bias and clinical translation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Generative artificial intelligence in lung cancer care: current applications, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Five essential features for adoption of clinical risk prediction tools: Insights from the VOCAL-Penn score.Hepatology communications · 2025Article
- Assessing physicians' experiences with a clinical decision support system in patient blood management programme: a cross-sectional observational study.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- Understanding the Role of Clinical Decision Support Systems Among Hospital Nurses Using the FITT (Fit Between Individuals, Tasks, and Technology) Framework: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Clinical Decision Support Systems in Indian Healthcare Settings: Benefits, Barriers, and Future Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Medicine: A Scoping Review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing reviews have identified factors influencing Clinical Decision Support (CDS) adoption by clinicians in practice but overlook the dynamic and evolving nature of technology and users' needs over time. This review aimed to identify factors that influence early, mid-term, and sustained acceptance and use of CDS in hospital settings. Five databases were searched from 2007 to January 2024 and 67 papers were included. Factors were extracted and synthesised according to the time that data were collected following CDS implementation. Factors relating to the CDS intervention (e.g. utility) and inner setting (e.g. fit with workflows) were reported across all time periods. Perceived outcomes were more often identified in the first year of use, and individual factors after the first 6 months of use. Strategies to work around CDS limitations were reported 5 years after implementation. Our review provides guidance for developing, implementing, and supporting ongoing use of CDS systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.