ArticleScientific reports2025
Bi directional sparse attention recurrent autoencoder based intrusion detection for VANET security with tuna swarm optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Lightweight Sequential AI Framework for Real Time Intrusion Detection in Dynamic Vehicular Networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) have garnered a lot of consideration and research in last decades. By enhancing safety and comfort, VANETs are essential to the development of self-driving and semi-self-driving cars. Security risks that are specific to VANET or that are observed in ad hoc networks, however, pose significant difficulties. External communication with the situation through data control and Cooperative Awareness Messages (CAMs) exchanges is crucial for these vehicles. Numerous assaults could possibly target VANETs. VANETs may be vulnerable to several types of assaults. The lack of intrusion detection systems, inadequate encryption methods, insecure communication routes, and inadequate authentication processes are some of the technological flaws in VANETs that make smart vehicles vulnerable to attacks. The security and effectiveness of smart vehicle operations suffer because these flaws allow attackers to intercept, change, or interrupt communication between vehicles. Owing to these security concerns, this study introduces a Bi-directional sparse Attention-recurrent Auto Encoder (BSAR-AE) based Intrusion Detection System (IDS) in VANET. The system uses the Tuna Swarm optimizer (TSO) with the enhancement through the implementation of Deep Neural Network (DNN) based feature selection in VANET. It is a useful technique for resolving issues with deep layer neural networks, like low velocity and overfitting issues in learning. The evolutionary based optimization effectively tuned the hyper parameters of the DL model which will improve the detection accuracy. The system use of the CICIDS2017 dataset, which is associated with actual data and the experimented analysis shows that the proposed model is effectual for detecting the malicious attacks in VANET with improved accuracy of 98.7%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.