ArticleScientific reports2025
Reduction of tar, sulfur, chlorine and CO
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective waste management is an increasingly urgent global challenge, with gasification emerging as promising alternative to conventional disposal methods. However, the major challenge in thermochemical waste processing is the presence of contaminants in the product streams. Therefore, this study focuses on the experimental gasification of refuse-derived fuel (RDF) pellets, with the aim of characterizing the products, analyzing contaminant distribution, and purifying the syngas from multiple contaminants simultaneously. Gasification experiments were conducted in a two-stage batch reactor, and the produced syngas was purified using two continuous packed absorption columns. Yields of gaseous, liquid, and solid products were 52.5%, 23.5%, and 7.3%, respectively. Resulting char exhibited a lower heating value (LHV) of 18.24 MJ/kg and retained 76.8% of the sulfur and 35.8% of the chlorine from the RDF. Heavy metal concentrations in the char remained below environmental limits. Syngas achieved a maximum LHV of 11.9 MJ/Nm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.