Observational studyScientific reports2025
Machine learning based predictive model of the risk of Tourette syndrome with SHAP value interpretation: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based screening model for Tic disorders comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and SHAP value interpretation: a retrospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Long-term exposure to polystyrene microplastics exacerbates seizure symptoms via lipid metabolic disruption and ferroptosis: insights from multi-omics analyses.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Towards precision medicine in Tourette syndrome: a perspective on AI-driven predictive modelling and personalised care.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Review
- Clinician perspectives on explainability in AI-driven closed-loop neurotechnology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting Early Dysphagia in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tourette syndrome is a relatively prevalent neurological condition, particularly among children, characterized by sudden, involuntary, repetitive movements or vocalizations. Contemporary diagnostic approaches for Tourette syndrome (TS) primarily rely on behavioral assessments, which pose challenges due to symptom overlap with other psychiatric disorders and significant inter-individual variability. Establishing a machine learning-based predictive model for predicting the risk of TS could potentially enhance diagnostic precision and treatment effectiveness. The investigation was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, spanning the period from January 2022 to October 2024. Clinical data, encompassing complete blood counts, liver and kidney function assessments, blood glucose levels, and serum electrolyte analyses, were collected. Feature selection was conducted using Boruta and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and model construction was undertaken employing 9 distinct machine learning algorithms. 10 distinct features were selected for machine learning algorithm development, and our results indicated that the Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm is the optimal model. Our study successfully established a predictive model for the risk of Tourette syndrome using Gradient Boosting Machine, and the SHAP method highlighted the key roles of β2-microglobulin and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.