Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40419568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Predicting high confidence ctDNA somatic variants with ensemble machine learning models.

Rugare Maruzani, Liam Brierley, Andrea Jorgensen, Anna Fowler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rugare MaruzaniDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Great Britain and Northern Ireland, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block F, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK. r.maruzani@liverpool.ac.uk.
Liam BrierleySchool Of Infection & Immunity, of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Room 405, Sir Michael Stoker Building, Garscube Campus, 464 Bearsden Road, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK.
Andrea JorgensenDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Great Britain and Northern Ireland, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block F, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.
Anna FowlerDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, Great Britain and Northern Ireland, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block F, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015902/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a minimally invasive cancer biomarker that can be used to inform treatment of cancer patients. The utility of ctDNA as a cancer biomarker depends on the ability to accurately detect somatic variants associated with cancer. Accurate somatic variant detection in circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) NGS data requires filtering strategies to remove germline variants, and NGS artifacts. Rule-based variant filtering methods either remove a substantial number of true positive ctDNA variants along with false variant calls or retain an implausibly large number of total variants. Machine Learning (ML) enables identification of complex patterns which may improve ability to distinguish between real somatic ctDNA variants and false positive calls. We built two Random Forest (RF) models for predicting high confidence somatic ctDNA variants in low and high depth cfDNA NGS data. Low depth models were fitted and evaluated on whole exome sequencing (WES) cfDNA data at depths of approximately 10X while the high depth data was sequenced at approximately 500X. Both models utilise a set of 15 features from variants detected by bcftools, FreeBayes, LoFreq and Mutect2. High confidence ground truth sets were obtained from matched tissue biopsy samples. We benchmarked our models against rule-based filtering with a set of hard, medium, and soft thresholds. Precision-recall curves showed the high depth model outperformed rule-based filtering at all thresholds in Test Data (PR-AUC 0.71). Partial dependence plots showed membership in the COSMIC database, absence from the dbSNP common variants database, and increasing read depth increased mean probability of high confidence somatic variant prediction in both models. Our results demonstrate the utility of supervised ML models for filtering variants in cfDNA data.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAMachine LearningNeoplasmsExome SequencingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID40419568
PMCPMC12106698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.