ArticleScientific reports2025
Tactile and interpersonal sound symbolic associations in patients with multiple somatic symptoms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with functional somatic symptoms (FSS) have distorted exteroception and interoception. It is unclear whether they also process and associate sounds and tactile/interpersonal factors differently. This study investigates the differences in how patients with multiple somatic symptoms (SS-high) and those without functional somatic disorders (SS-low) associate features of Mandarin rimes with tactile and interpersonal properties. Two groups of participants listened to rime chains consisting of two identical Mandarin rimes. They rated sound stimuli on five-point scales for smooth-rough, light-heavy, polite-rude, and friendly-hostile. Linear mixed-effects models and representational similarity analyses showed that both groups relied on duration and F0 for all four dimensions, and on alveolar nasal rimes and ΔF1 for the smooth-rough dimension. Beyond commonalities, the study also found that the two groups of participants weighed F1-F3 and nasality differently when associating rimes with tactile and interpersonal dimensions. Mediation analyses revealed differing mechanisms for sound symbolism between the groups. In the SS-high group, the smooth-rough dimension mediated the association between duration and the polite-rude dimension, which aligned with the Transitivity Proposal. In the SS-low group, the relationship between duration and smoothness was mediated by politeness, supporting the Emotion Mediation Hypothesis. This study highlights the importance of considering both tactile and interpersonal dimensions in sound symbolism research, especially in clinical populations with FSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.