ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting cognitive frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a machine learning approach based on multidomain risk factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global Prevalence of Cognitive Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring the Impact of Anesthesia on Postoperative Frailty Trajectories in Older Adults.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Frailty Prediction and Classification in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Validation, Explainability, and Implementation Readiness.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and Internal Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Classification Model for Identifying Cognitive Frailty in Older Inpatients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Advancing fall risk prediction in older adults with cognitive frailty: A machine learning approach using 2-year clinical data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and comparative validation of multiple models for cognitive frailty in older adults residing in nursing homes.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive frailty (CF), a clinical syndrome involving both physical frailty (PF) and impaired cognition (IC), is associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults. This study aimed to identify key predictors of CF and develop a machine learning-based model for CF risk assessment using data from 2404 community-dwelling older adults in the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (2016-2017). PF was evaluated using Fried frailty phenotype, while IC was assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Participants exhibiting at least one frailty phenotype and MMSE score ≤ 24 were classified as having CF. A comprehensive analysis encompassing sociodemographic, clinical, and health status characteristics was conducted. A machine learning approach incorporating recursive feature elimination and bootstrapping was employed to develop the prediction model. Among the diverse CF-associated characteristics, the machine learning-based model identified six optimal features (key predictors): motor capacity, education level, physical function limitation, nutritional status, balance confidence, and activities of daily living. The model demonstrated robust predictive performance, achieving an area under the curve of 84.34%, with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive health assessments for early CF detection and demonstrate the potential of predictive modeling in facilitating personalized interventions for at-risk older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.