ArticleBlood cancer journal2025
Attrition rates and treatment outcomes in multiple myeloma: real-world data over a 40-year period.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Anti-CD38-based quadruplet versus triplet induction regimens in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of hematology · 2026Pooled it
- Temporal trends and demographic patterns in multiple myeloma incidence in the United States: a 24-year analysis of the CDC WONDER database (1999-2022).Blood cancer journal · 2026Observational
- Enhanced antitumoral activity of the academic CAR-T ARI0002h against normal and low BCMA-expressing myeloma cells after incorporating a transmembrane CD28 domain.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved significantly over four decades, driven by novel therapies and optimized supportive care. However, the attrition rate (AR), defined as the proportion of patients who die without advancing to the next line of therapy (LOT) after treatment failure, remains a major challenge. To assess how treatment patterns and outcomes have evolved, we analyzed 1,297 MM patients treated between 1980 and 2020, stratified by diagnosis period and age. ARs declined from 38-55% in the 1980s to 15-20% in 2010-2020, but remained high in older patients, with 46.9% of those over 80 unable to proceed beyond first LOT. While progression-free survival gains were primarily observed in the first LOT (15.8 to 24.1 months, p = 0.001), overall survival (OS) improved across all LOTs and age groups, likely due to more effective salvage therapies and supportive care. Achieving a complete response in first-line therapy was associated with a significant OS benefit (4.5 vs. 1.6 years, p < 0.001), underscoring its importance, as many patients, particularly older ones, are less likely to reach subsequent LOTs. Despite advances in MM treatment, patient loss to attrition remains a challenge, highlighting the need for more effective therapies early in the disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.