ArticleAsia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition2025
Malnourished, gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: burden of nutritional risk, use of oral nutritional supplements, and impact on health outcomes.
Article in Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of oral nutritional supplements on chemotherapy tolerance and overall survival in postoperative colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of combined nutrition, exercise and psychological interventions in patients with malignancy: A randomized controlled trial.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- Immuno-Nutritional Profiling for Survival Stratification in Gastrectomized Patients with Malignant Chronic Intestinal Failure.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Nutritional Risk in Oral Surgery Inpatients: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis Using Nutritional Risk Screening-2002.JMA journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPatients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are at high risk for malnutrition because of reduced food intake, poor digestion, and altered absorption. METHODS AND STUDY
designIn a ret-rospective review of medical records for patients admitted to urban hospitals in an Asian nation for GI tumor surgery (gastric, colon, or anorectal cancers), we found that malnutrition was common yet often overlooked. Our review identified records for 349 adult GI-tumor surgery patients. The Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) was the most frequently used screening instrument. In further review, we compared outcomes for malnourished GI tumor surgery patients given daily oral nutritional supplements (ONS) to outcomes for patients who were not given ONS.
resultsReview of results revealed that only 20% of patients in our sample underwent nutritional screening or assessment on admission. Of those who did, nearly 60% were malnourished. Although due to small sample sizes, no statistically significant differences were observed, mal-nourished patients who received ONS had fewer complications and shorter lengths of stay by 1-day. Such findings reveal many missed opportunities to improve patient outcomes and to avert excess healthcare costs for treatment of complications, slowed recovery, longer hospital stays, and readmissions.
conclusionsBased on our findings, nutritional training for professionals is necessary to address the serious problems of under-recognition and inadequate treatment of malnutrition in hospitalized patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.