Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40419353›Full record

ArticleZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2025

[Expert consensus on systematic assessment and treatment of refractory wounds in the elderly (2025 edition)].

Burns and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society

Abstract readEnglish AbstractConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Burns and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program 2021YFC2009400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early prevention and standardized management of refractory wounds in the elderly are very important for improving prognosis, reducing disability rate, and improving the quality of life of patients. For the diagnosis and treatment of refractory wounds in the elderly, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the primary disease or comorbidity of patients and systematically evaluate the overall condition and the local characteristics of wounds of patients. The treatment principles include controlling or slowing down the development of the primary disease, nutritional support, infection control, improving circulation, sealing wounds, and paying attention to the water balance of wounds, at the same time selecting a reasonable treatment plan according to different types of wounds. The goal of treatment is to close the wound as much as possible if conditions permit, while in some cases, palliative management may be appropriate. In the future, the development of smart wear, big data, and artificial intelligence will play a significant role in promoting the assessment and treatment of refractory wounds in the elderly. The Burns and Trauma Branch of Chinese Geriatrics Society organized domestic experts engaged in wound repair and related fields to jointly formulate this consensus, aiming to establish a full-process standard covering prevention, assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation and to promote the standardization and intelligence of diagnosis and treatment of refractory wounds in the elderly, thus providing efficient and homogeneous solutions for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Wounds and InjuriesAgedConsensusHumansWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID40419353
PMCPMC12123597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.