ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Development and Evaluation of Offsite Repository for Clinical Assets, a Resilient Solution for Order Set Access during EHR Downtimes.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are central to modern health care, but their effectiveness is compromised during system downtimes, which affect 96% of health care organizations. During these failures, clinicians lose access to critical decision-making tools like order sets, increasing the risk of medical errors. Traditional downtime solutions, such as paper-based protocols, are often impractical and difficult to maintain.This study introduces and evaluates Offsite Repository for Clinical Assets (ORCA), a resilient web-based solution designed to maintain access to electronic health record (EHR) order sets during system failures. We assessed its usability and effectiveness as a downtime decision support tool across various clinical settings.ORCA was developed based on an analysis of previous downtime incidents, replicating essential order set functionality while ensuring offsite accessibility. We conducted usability testing with 16 clinicians from diverse specialties, using structured tasks and think-aloud protocols. User feedback was collected through the Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX) questionnaire and thematic analysis of interview transcripts.ORCA demonstrated strong usability (mean UMUX score: 86.2). Thematic analysis revealed key implementation challenges: system limitations, workflow integration, and interface navigation. Users valued ORCA's familiar interface and offsite accessibility but identified critical gaps in dynamic decision support capabilities.ORCA represents a viable approach to maintaining basic clinical decision support (CDS) during downtimes. However, significant challenges remain in replicating dynamic CDS features and ensuring effective integration with existing downtime procedures. These findings inform future development of resilient CDSS and highlight the importance of planned fallback pathways in clinical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.