ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2025
Enhancing IMRT/VMAT Competencies in LMICs globally within radiation physicists through remote training.
Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy a Safe and Effective Strategy for Cervical Cancer?-A Review of Current Evidence.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeHigh-quality intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is necessary to drive positive patient outcomes, yet gaps in staff training hinder its implementation in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs). This work aimed to evaluate a large-scale remote training curriculum for medical physicists and clinicians with existing IMRT infrastructure in LMICs. MATERIALS AND
methodsA 15-week free, virtual course with weekly live sessions incorporating didactics and case-based learning led by expert volunteers was conducted. The first 500 registrants were accepted into the program. Participants' confidence and knowledge was evaluated via pre- and post-course surveys on a 1-5 Likert scale across seven IMRT/VMAT domains and through 11 multiple-choice questions. Participants also created treatment plans for standardized bilateral head-and-neck cancer cases, assessed by eight expert volunteers using qualitative rubrics and quantitative scorecards on the ProKnow DS platform. Performances were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
resultsA total of 240 medical physicists, medical physics residents, and dosimetrists responded to both the pre- and post-course surveys. Mean confidence scores increased from 3.00/5 (SD: 1.04) to 3.80/5 (0.87) (p < 0.001). Knowledge scores improved from 4.16/11 (SD: 1.77) to 5.98/11 (SD: 2.11) (p < 0.001). Additionally, 33 participants completed both the pre-course and post-course treatment planning assignments. Automated scorecard performance significantly improved from 12.64/25 (SD: 7.50) to 17.74/25 (SD: 6.74) (p = 0.0004). Grading rubric scores did not significantly change, from 9.15/14 (SD: 3.33) to 9.76/14 (SD: 2.65) (p = 0.4).
conclusionThe virtual IMRT/VMAT curriculum significantly enhanced knowledge, confidence, and treatment planning skills among participants, demonstrating a scalable, low-cost intervention for improving IMRT/VMAT implementation in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.