ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2025
Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Prognostic Stratification of Patients With Glioblastoma.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal data-based graph convolutional networks for predicting outcomes in ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Ensemble Machine Learning Approaches Predict Survival in Lower-Grade Glioma Based on Glycosphingolipid Gene Expression and Metabolic Modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- AI-driven WHO 2021 classification of gliomas based only on H&E-stained slides.Neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- 3D spatial sampling to quantify morphologic heterogeneity in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025Article
- Interpretable artificial intelligence based determination of glioma IDH mutation status directly from histology slides.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive malignant adult tumor of the central nervous system, with a grim prognosis and heterogeneous morphologic and molecular profiles. Since the adoption of the current standard-of-care treatment in 2005, no substantial prognostic improvement has been noticed. In this study, we seek the identification of prognostically relevant GBM characteristics from routinely acquired hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images (WSIs) and clinical data, which when integrated via advanced computational methods could yield improved patient prognostic stratification and hence optimize clinical decision making and patient management. The proposed WSI analysis capitalizes on a comprehensive curation of apparent artifactual content and an interpretability mechanism via a weakly supervised attention-based multiple-instance learning approach that further utilizes clustering to constrain the search space. Patterns automatically identified by our approach as of high prognostic value classify each WSI as representative of short or long survivors. Further assessments of the prognostic relevance of the associated clinical patient data are performed both in isolation and in an integrated manner, using XGBoost and SHapley Additive exPlanations. The multimodal integration of WSI with clinical data yields enhanced stratification performance when compared with using either one of the modalities. Identifying tumor morphologic and clinical patterns associated with short and long survival will enable the clinical neuropathologist to provide additional relevant prognostic information to the treating team and suggest avenues of biological investigation for further understanding and potentially treating GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.