ArticleIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
Contralateral pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.
Article in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a rare case of a 79-year-old man who developed contralateral pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium following dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for symptomatic second-degree atrioventricular block. The procedure itself was uneventful, with appropriate lead placement and good electrical parameters. However, 30 minutes post-procedure, the patient developed right-sided pleuritic chest pain and dyspnea. Imaging revealed a right-sided pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pneumomediastinum, and pneumopericardium. A chest drain was inserted due to the significant pneumothorax volume, leading to symptom resolution. Electrocardiographic changes and inflammatory marker elevation suggested pericarditis, which was successfully treated with ibuprofen and colchicine. The patient was discharged after 13 days and remained stable at a 1-year follow-up. The suspected mechanism of injury was atrial lead perforation, although other causes, such as pleural puncture or superior vena cava injury, were considered. Management of such cases varies, with lead revision being unnecessary in this patient due to stable pacing parameters. This case highlights an unusual complication of pacemaker implantation and underscores the importance of prompt diagnosis and individualized management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.