Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40419020›Full record

ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2025

Choosing Between HLA-Mismatched Unrelated and Haploidentical Donors: Donor Age Considerations.

Rohtesh S Mehta, Gabrielle Schmidt, Kirsten Williams, Shyam A Patel, Johannes Schetelig, Bipin Savani, Medhat Askar, Effie Petersdorf, Olle Ringden, Christopher G Kanakry and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Donor selection, graft engineering, and dosing oh my!Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  10. Future directions in transplantation for aplastic anemia.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Rohtesh S MehtaStem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: rmehta1@mdanderson.org.
Gabrielle SchmidtCIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kirsten WilliamsEmory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
Shyam A PatelUniversity of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Johannes ScheteligUniversitaetsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Bipin SavaniVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Medhat AskarBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Effie PetersdorfFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Olle RingdenKarolinska University Hospital, Centre for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Huddinge, Sweden.
Christopher G KanakryNational Cancer Institute-NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jennifer A KanakryNational Cancer Institute-NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Heather StefanskiCIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Esteban Arrieta-BolañosUniversitatsklinikum Essen KMT, Essen, Germany.
Brian BettsRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York.
Cara BenjaminDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Shahinaz GadallaNational Cancer Institute (NCI), National Cancer Institute - NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Tao WangCIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jennifer SaultzOregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Stephen SpellmanCIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Najla El JurdiNational Cancer Institute-NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Yung-Tsi BolonCIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stephanie J LeeFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical Science and Translational SupplementUL1TR001453 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2015 to 2024
$39.0M
NTP INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT27305C0011 · NIEHS · Z-TECH CORPORATION · 2007 to 2009
$4.3M
Clinical and mechanistic studies defining optimal preparative approaches to infants with IL2RG/JAK3/RAG1/RAG2 SCID: a randomized trial of busulfan dosageU01AI184132 · NIAID · NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM · PI JEFFERY J AULETTA, Michael A Pulsipher · 2024 to 2026
$3.2M
BMT Core - Pediatric Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consortium (PTCTC): Providing Clinical Trial Access For Children With Life Threatening DiseasesUG1HL174426 · NHLBI · NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM · PI Leslie S Kean, Heather E Stefanski · 2024 to 2026
$513k
PROVIDE RABBITS, RATS, MICE, HAMSTERS, GERBILS, GUINEA PIGS27307C0011 · NIEHS · PI BOLEN, WAYNE · 2007 to 2007
$500k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001453NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL174426NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI184132NIEHS NIH HHS 27305C0011NIEHS NIH HHS 27307C0011NIEHS NIH HHS 27398C0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Haploidentical donors and HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs) are increasingly utilized for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) emerging as an effective graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategy. Despite the growing use of these donor types, comparative data to guide donor selection remain limited. Donor age is a known predictor of HCT outcomes, yet its specific impact when choosing between haploidentical and MMUD donors with PTCy-based prophylaxis has not been thoroughly explored. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of donor age on HCT outcomes in patients receiving haploidentical or MMUD HCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis, hypothesizing that younger donors (<30 years) would be associated with improved outcomes compared to older donors (≥30 years) regardless of donor type. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 7116 patients with hematologic malignancies from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, transplanted between 2013 and 2021. Donors were categorized into four groups: younger haploidentical (<30 years), older haploidentical (≥30 years), younger MMUD (<30 years), and older MMUD (≥30 years). The primary outcome was GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS), defined as the absence of grade III to IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy (IST), relapse, or death. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, treatment-related mortality (TRM), relapse, grade III to IV acute GVHD, overall chronic GVHD, and chronic GVHD requiring IST. Comparisons were made between (1) younger MMUD versus older haploidentical and (2) younger haploidentical versus older MMUD groups using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. In multivariable analysis, the older MMUD group exhibited inferior GRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.36; P = .003), higher TRM (HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.96; P = .005), and increased grade III to IV acute GVHD (HR 2.88; 95% CI, 1.43 to 5.80; P = .003) compared to the younger haploidentical group. The younger MMUD group had modest GRFS improvement over the older haploidentical group (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .02) and significantly reduced risks of grade II to IV acute GVHD (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.88; P = .003) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94; P = .009). Younger donor age is associated with superior HCT outcomes, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing donors aged <30 years regardless of donor type when feasible.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHLA AntigensTransplantation, HaploidenticalUnrelated DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsCyclophosphamideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCyclophosphamideHLA AntigensDonor ageHaploidenticalMismatched unrelated donorMMUDPost-transplantation cyclophosphamidePTCy

Identifiers

PMID40419020
PMCPMC12403200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.