Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418928›Full record

ArticleActa haematologica2026

Ultrasonography-Guided Core-Needle Biopsy for Newly Diagnosed Large B-Cell Lymphomas: Analysis on Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety in an Italian Retrospective Study.

Marco Picardi, Claudia Giordano, Annamaria Vincenzi, Novella Pugliese, Alessia Scarpa, Massimo Mascolo, Elena Vigliar, Giancarlo Troncone, Claudia Salvatore, Fabrizio Pane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco PicardiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Unit, Federico II University Medical School, Naples, Italy.
Claudia GiordanoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Unit, Federico II University Medical School, Naples, Italy, claudiagiordano91.cg@gmail.com.
Annamaria VincenziDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Unit, Federico II University Medical School, Naples, Italy.
Novella PuglieseDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Unit, Federico II University Medical School, Naples, Italy.
Alessia ScarpaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Unit, Federico II University Medical School, Naples, Italy.
Massimo MascoloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University Medical School, Naples, Italy.
Elena VigliarDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University Medical School Naples, Naples, Italy.
Giancarlo TronconeDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University Medical School Naples, Naples, Italy.
Claudia SalvatoreDepartment of Public Health, Federico II University Medical School Naples, Naples, Italy.
Fabrizio PaneDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Unit, Federico II University Medical School, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Introduction: Excisional biopsy (EB) is the gold standard for large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) diagnosis. Based on recent advances in interventional radiology enabling accurate sampling with core needle biopsy (CNB), we evaluated efficacy and safety of CNB under imaging guidance for diagnosing LBCLs.

methodsAt the Hematology and Pathology Units of the Federico II University Medical School of Naples (Italy), we retrospectively collected patients with lymphadenopathies suspected of lymphomas (during 2009-2022) of which the ultrasonography (US)-guided CNB lymph node samples were available. Subsequently, we investigated the accuracy and safety of US-guided CNB for LBCLs diagnosis.

resultsOver a 12-year period, 800 (superficial target, n = 560; deep-seated target, n = 240) lymph node biopsies performed with 16-gauge diameter modified Menghini needle under power-Doppler ultrasonographic guidance have been evaluated in 800 patients. According to the reference standard, 220 were suffering from LBCLs (diffuse LBCL NOS [n = 196], and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements [n = 24]) subtypes, other malignancy subtypes (n = 510) and non-malignant findings (n = 70). For the series of LBCLs, the overall diagnostic accuracy of the micro-histological sampling was 100% (95% confidence interval: 98%-100%). The complications occurred with very low incidence and severity (grade ≤2).

conclusionUS-guided CNB is a less invasive method and can be considered an alternative to EB for LBCL diagnosis. </p>.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleFemaleHumansItalyLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesCore-needle biopsyLarge B-cell lymphomasPower-Doppler ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40418928
PMCPMC12173430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.