ArticleDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)2026
Telehealth triage in pediatric rheumatology: a diagnostically accurate tool to improve access to care.
Article in Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDuring the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, new patient evaluations in pediatric rheumatology were performed using telehealth. Given the pediatric rheumatology workforce shortage, telehealth may be a way to efficiently triage referrals. The objective was to assess the utility of telehealth visits as a diagnostic tool to accurately assess the need for in-person evaluation.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated by telehealth for a new patient visit from March 1 to June 30, 2020 at a tertiary center. Electronic health record documentation from subsequent rheumatology, specialty, and primary care encounters over the subsequent 4 years were reviewed. The primary outcome was diagnostic concordance, defined as consistency in the documented diagnostic reasoning, between the initial telehealth video visit and in-person follow-up visits.
resultsDuring the study period, there were 111 telehealth visits, 80 (72 %) of which had follow-up data. 55/80 had in-person rheumatology evaluations. Only 9 % patients had discordant diagnoses, all of whom had initial concern for inflammatory arthritis during the telehealth visit but a diagnosis of a non-inflammatory condition after in-person evaluation. Nine patients with a significant rheumatic disease were identified via telehealth. There were no unplanned ED visits or hospital admissions following telehealth visits. 33 % of patients were found to not warrant rheumatologic follow-up after the telehealth visit.
conclusionsFor pediatric rheumatology new patient evaluations, diagnostic accuracy via telehealth evaluation was high. Providers triaged patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions for in-person evaluations and were able to accurately identify benign conditions that did not require in-person follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.