ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Endoscopic percutaneous extraction of a retained bullet fragment in the lumbar spine for lead toxicity management: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is often common practice to leave gunshot wound (GSW) bullet fragments in the spinal column given the morbidity of surgical removal. When extraction is indicated, the least invasive approach is favored to preserve surrounding neurovascular structures, particularly in cases without focal neurological deficits. This report highlights a percutaneous endoscopic technique for the retrieval of a retained bullet causing lead toxicity. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present the case of an 18-year-old female who presented for a GSW bullet lodged within her lumbar spine, who was neurologically intact with no overt instability. Outpatient follow-up was concerning for elevating blood lead serum levels of 12 μg/dL, which exceeded WHO guidelines of < 5 μg/dL. She underwent endoscopic removal of the bullet with no complications and subsequent improvement of her lead levels. LESSONS: Endoscopic techniques present a promising approach for removing bullets from the spine, with reduced tissue trauma, improved visualization, and shorter recovery times compared with traditional open or minimally invasive surgery. In cases of retained bullet fragments with no focal deficit, migration, or instability, conservative management with serial lead monitoring is recommended. However, when surgical removal is indicated from lead toxicity, endoscopic extraction of foreign bullets can be considered as an effective, yet less invasive alternative to open or minimally invasive surgical procedures. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE2538.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.