ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Long-term outcomes and radiation-induced complications following stereotactic radiosurgery for a left temporal arteriovenous malformation: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies associated with significant risks of hemorrhage and neurological deficits. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a viable treatment option, particularly for small, deep-seated, or eloquent lesions, offering a less invasive alternative to microsurgical resection. However, SRS carries risks, including radiation-induced complications such as radiation necrosis. OBSERVATIONS: This report describes the case of a 24-year-old male with a left temporal AVM, classified as Spetzler-Martin grade II, who underwent SRS with a marginal dose of 18 Gy. Over a 36-month follow-up period, complete obliteration of the AVM nidus was achieved. However, significant radiation-induced complications emerged, including vasogenic edema, radiation necrosis, memory deficits, partial seizures, and bilateral visual field defects. These complications peaked around 20 months post-SRS, requiring long-term management with corticosteroids, diuretics, and anticonvulsants. LESSONS: This case underscores the importance of balancing the benefits of AVM obliteration with the risks of radiation-induced injury. While SRS is effective for treating AVMs, particularly in high-risk locations, the potential for delayed complications highlights the need for careful patient selection, meticulous treatment planning, and long-term follow-up. The report also discusses the pathophysiology of radiation-induced necrosis, strategies to mitigate its risk, and the role of advanced imaging techniques in optimizing treatment planning. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25201.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.