ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Revisiting traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in the context of ENRICH: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (tICH) is a common form of intracranial hemorrhage after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The role of surgical intervention in tICH remains a subject of discussion. Recent trials, such as Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ENRICH), have shown the efficacy of minimally invasive clot evacuation for non-tICH for hemorrhages with volumes of 30-80 mL. The generalizability of ENRICH to tICH remains unclear; however, it demonstrates the need for rigorous studies evaluating the efficacy of surgical intervention in tICH versus medical management. OBSERVATIONS: Here the authors present 2 cases of tICH, both in the dominant temporal lobe, of similar volumes. One case was managed surgically and the other medically. The decision to operate on the first patient was due to interval enlargement of the hematoma. In the second patient, the decline in neurological examination was attributable to perilesional edema, and the decision was made to manage the patient medically. Both patients ultimately had good outcomes. LESSONS: The management of patients with tICH remains challenging. However, having a sophisticated understanding of the biological processes underlying the patient's presentation is paramount in delivering optimal management. Larger and more granular studies are needed in order to further clarify the role of operative intervention in patients with tICH. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24591.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.