SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2025
Associations Between Unconditional Cash Transfers and Postpartum Outcomes in the United States : A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnconditional cash transfers (UCTs) through social programs or direct cash transfers (DCTs) may address drivers of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality. PURPOSE: To summarize evidence on UCTs and postpartum outcomes in the United States. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Social Science Research Network, and structured internet searches through 28 January 2025. STUDY SELECTION: Primary research reporting associations between UCTs and postpartum outcomes (0 to 2 years after delivery) in the United States. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual data extraction with predefined outcomes: infant or child care, reproductive health, substance use, other mental health outcomes, and other outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tools. Strength of evidence (SOE) was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eleven reports from 6 studies were identified. Four quasi-experimental (QE) studies examined 3 different social programs, 2 of which targeted populations with low incomes. Seven reports from 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined DCTs to postpartum persons with low incomes. The evidence on UCTs showed an increase in breastfeeding (high SOE [2 RCTs, 2 QE studies]), little or no difference in postpartum mood (high SOE [1 RCT, 2 QE studies]), and low SOE or insufficient evidence for all other associations. LIMITATIONS: Unpublished studies and those not published in English may have been missed. Nonrandomized studies were subject to reporting or recall bias, reducing SOE. Study heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis.
conclusionUnconditional cash transfers increase breastfeeding in diverse settings and populations and result in little or no difference in postpartum mood specifically in persons with low incomes. No studies examined DCTs given during pregnancy. More evidence is needed on associations between UCTs and key clinical outcomes, such as postpartum maternal morbidity and mortality. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. (Registered on Open Science Framework [https://osf.io/4c3nx]).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.