Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418789›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Toward a Conceptual Framework for Digitally Supported Communication, Coordination, Cooperation, and Collaboration in Interprofessional Health Care: Scoping Review.

Kim Nordmann, Marie-Christin Redlich, Michael Schaller, Stefanie Sauter, Florian Fischer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kim NordmannBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-9603
Marie-Christin RedlichBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2973-5743
Michael SchallerBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1149-9252
Stefanie SauterBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-6506
Florian FischerBavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-1245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital tools for communication, coordination, cooperation, and collaboration (D4C), including electronic health records and specialized apps, are increasingly used in health care to ensure continuity of care across professional boundaries. Despite their growing adoption, there is a lack of precise and clear definitions, and no common understanding of D4C within health care.

objectiveThis study aims to explore the concepts and definitions of digitally supported communication, coordination, cooperation, and collaboration by mapping the individual attributes to build a foundation for the operationalization of these concepts and to generate a clear and precise understanding of these concepts in research, practice, and policy.

methodsA scoping review was conducted across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and Scopus to identify studies on D4C. We included peer-reviewed studies in English, French, German, Portuguese, and Spanish published since 2012. Definitions of the modes of interaction (communication, coordination, cooperation, and collaboration) and the digital tool supporting these interactions, along with their definitions in cited references, were extracted and analyzed.

resultsOf the 407 identified papers addressing D4C, 6.1% (n=25) defined the digital concept and 6.6% (n=27) defined the interaction supported by the digital tool, with even fewer being backed by a reference. The analysis of the definitions revealed a hierarchical framework, detailing dimensions, requisites, and goals for each mode of interaction and the digital tool. It delineates progression from communication to collaboration: communication enables the exchange of information; coordination involves organizing people, resources, and activities; cooperation focuses on dividing tasks to achieve shared goals; and collaboration, at the apex, involves jointly addressing care needs. Each mode of interaction can be supported by digital tools.

conclusionsThe proposed framework offers a structured approach to establish a shared understanding of the concept of D4C. This unified understanding can serve as a foundation for developing objectives related to the implementation and evaluation of digital tools aimed at fostering interprofessional interactions in health care. As such, it can inform stakeholders in their understanding of D4C, possibly improving workflows and patient care. Further research is needed to operationalize and validate the framework across health care settings. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/45179.

Indexed as

CommunicationCooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareInterprofessional RelationsElectronic Health RecordsHumanscare continuitycollaborationcommunicationcoordinationinterprofessional relations

Identifiers

PMID40418789
PMCPMC12149778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.