ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Immediate breast reconstruction surgery for breast cancer: current status and future directions.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond expansion: the strategic role of the tissue expander in immediate breast reconstruction.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Autologous Versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Insights From Recent Oncologic and Plastic Surgery Guidelines.Cureus · 2026Review
- Identifying psychosocial distress phenotypes in postoperative patients with breast cancer: A latent profile analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has become increasingly recognized in Japan as an important component of breast cancer care, improving patients' quality of life after mastectomy. While the adoption of IBR is growing, the reconstruction rate in Japan remains lower than in Western countries. To clarify the current practice and challenges, the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) conducted a nationwide survey.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive web-based questionnaire survey among all JBCS-certified institutions between December 2020 and February 2021. The survey assessed institutional capabilities, surgical techniques, decision-making criteria for BR, and the integration of adjuvant therapy.
resultsA total of 429 institutions responded, with 72.5% offering BR and 61.7% capable of providing immediate reconstruction. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) was performed at 73.7% of institutions offering reconstruction. Multidisciplinary conferences with plastic surgeons were held at 70.5% of institutions. Approximately 30% of institutions discontinued IBR if sentinel lymph node metastases were detected intraoperatively, and 62.8% avoided recommending IBR for patients likely to require postoperative radiation therapy. In 94% of institutions, BR did not cause delays in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, 15% of institutions modified their radiation therapy approach in reconstructed patients. Additionally, 27% of physicians still believed that BR could negatively affect prognosis.
conclusionsThe survey confirmed that IBR is widely performed and feasible in Japan. However, institutional differences, limited access to plastic surgeons, and persistent misconceptions remain significant barriers. Strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration and establishing standardized guidelines will help improve BR rates and patient outcomes in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.