Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418510›Full record

ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2025

EEG microstate analysis in trigeminal neuralgia: identifying potential biomarkers for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.

Reza Ahmadi Lashaki, Zahra Raeisi, Abolfazl Sodagartojgi, Fatemeh Abedi Lomer, Elnaz Aghdaei, Hossein Najafzadeh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reza Ahmadi LashakiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. lashaki@tabrizu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7570-8884
Zahra RaeisiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Fairleigh Dickinson, Vancouver Campus, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2334-3228
Abolfazl SodagartojgiDepartment of Statistics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Fatemeh Abedi LomerDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering islamic azad university Miyaneh branch, Miyaneh, Iran.
Elnaz AghdaeiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, USA.
Hossein NajafzadehDepartment of Medical Bioengineering, Faculty of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-8480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated EEG microstate dynamics in trigeminal neuralgia (TN) patients to understand the central nervous system's contribution to this neuropathic pain condition. Despite TN's traditional classification as a peripheral neuropathy, altered brain network organization may play a critical role in pain chronification and treatment resistance, making EEG microstates a valuable tool for capturing these dynamic neural signatures.

methodsWe analyzed resting-state EEG recordings from 14 healthy individuals and 36 TN patients through a systematic analytical pipeline. After preprocessing with a fifth-order Butterworth band-pass filter (10-40 Hz), we employed k-means clustering to identify four distinct microstate configurations (4-7 states). From these configurations, we extracted temporal parameters (duration, occurrence, coverage, and mean global field power) and constructed transition probability matrices to characterize brain state dynamics. These features were then evaluated using ANOVA and utilized in machine learning classification models to assess their discriminative potential.

resultsTN patients demonstrated distinct microstate abnormalities, including dramatically increased durations in specific microstates (5-6 times longer than controls) and consistently reduced global field power (0.03 vs. 0.35). Transition probability analyses revealed striking differences between groups: healthy subjects exhibited balanced bidirectional transitions (particularly B↔C at ~ 31-33%), whereas TN patients showed highly asymmetric patterns with strong directional flows (B→A: 33.5%, C→A: 35.2%, D→A: 34.4% in 4-state model). Most notably, state E functioned as a distinctive "sink" in TN patients, receiving significant transitions while exhibiting minimal outward flow (only 2.8-3.6% in 7-state model), suggesting trapped neural processing. Machine learning classification achieved exceptional discrimination between groups (91.9% accuracy with SVM), with optimal performance using four features in simpler 4-state models.

conclusionOur findings establish EEG microstate analysis as a promising neurophysiological framework for understanding TN pathophysiology, revealing objective biomarkers that reflect altered brain network dynamics rather than simply peripheral nerve dysfunction. These distinctive microstate patterns align with contemporary pain processing theories and offer potential applications in diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and development of novel therapeutic approaches targeting the central mechanisms of TN.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyTrigeminal NeuralgiaAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersDiagnostic accuracyEEGMachine learningMicrostate analysisNeural biomarkersNeurophysiologyTrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.