Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418502›Full record

ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2025

Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of astaxanthin from Corynebacterium glutamicum.

Jan Seeger, Maximilian Zäh, Volker F Wendisch, Christoph Brandenbusch, Nadja A Henke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan SeegerGenetics of Prokaryotes, Faculty of Biology & CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Maximilian ZähLaboratory of Thermodynamics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Volker F WendischGenetics of Prokaryotes, Faculty of Biology & CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Christoph BrandenbuschLaboratory of Thermodynamics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Nadja A HenkeGenetics of Prokaryotes, Faculty of Biology & CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. nadja.henke@kit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1304-6310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astaxanthin, a red carotenoid with potent antioxidant properties, holds significant value in the feed, cosmetics, and nutraceutical industries. While traditionally sourced from microalgae, Corynebacterium glutamicum, a well-established industrial microorganism, has been engineered to serve as an efficient host for astaxanthin production. As astaxanthin integrates into the cellular membrane, effective extraction methods are essential to access this valuable compound. In this study, a sustainable batch extraction process using supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO₂) as a green solvent was developed. The effects of cosolvent concentration (0-9% (w/w)), temperature (50-75 °C), and pressure (450-650 bar) were investigated with regard to the extraction yield. An optimized extraction was achieved with 9% (w/w) ethanol as a cosolvent, at 68 °C and 550 bar, allowing the extraction of 67.5 ± 3.7% of the cellular astaxanthin within 0.5 h. Prolonging the extraction time further increased the recovery to 93.3%, which is comparable to processes that have been established for the extraction of astaxanthin from microalgae and yeast. This approach provides a scalable and environmentally friendly solution for industrial astaxanthin recovery.

Indexed as

AstaxanthinCorynebacterium glutamicumExtractionSupercritical carbon dioxide

Identifiers

PMID40418502
PMCPMC12106249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.