Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418494›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Imaging in gynecological disease (28): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous and mucinous cystadenomas in the adnexa.

F Mascilini, F Moro, T Pasciuto, P Sladkevicius, W Froyman, L Jokubkiene, C Van Holsbeke, D Franchi, E Epstein, S Guerriero and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

F Mascilini *Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0736-3114
F Moro *Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5070-7245
T PasciutoResearch Core Facility Data Collection G-STEP, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
P SladkeviciusDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
W FroymanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1398-9124
L JokubkieneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
C Van HolsbekeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
D FranchiPreventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
E EpsteinDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
S GuerrieroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1359-7155
V ChiappaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
F BuonomoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-2622
M J KudlaDepartment of Perinatology and Oncological Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0928-3433
J L AlcázarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, Pamplona, Spain.
L HochbergImaged-Based Gynecology Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
F CiccaroneDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2104-0602
L QuagliozziDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
G ScambiaDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
D TimmermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
L ValentinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3830-6414
A C TestaDipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous and mucinous cystadenomas in the adnexa.

methodsThis was a retrospective international multicenter study. Using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database, patients with a histological diagnosis of serous or mucinous cystadenoma who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination between 1999 and 2016 (IOTA studies phase 1, 1b, 2, 3 and 5) were identified. All masses were described using the standardized IOTA terminology. The diagnosis assigned by the original ultrasound examiner based on subjective assessment was recorded. Two reviewers assessed the available digital ultrasound images using pattern recognition to identify typical sonographic features of cystadenomas.

resultsA total of 1318 patients were included: 687 (52.1%) with serous cystadenomas and 631 (47.9%) with mucinous cystadenomas. Based on the data recorded prospectively in the IOTA database, for serous cystadenomas the median diameter of the largest tumor was 68 (range, 14-320) mm. Most serous cystadenomas were described as unilateral (588/687 (85.6%)), with unilocular (274/687 (39.9%)) or multilocular (221/687 (32.2%)) morphology, and most had anechoic cyst content (508/687 (73.9%)). Most serous cystadenomas were not vascularized (color score of 1; 327/687 (47.6%)) or were poorly vascularized (color score of  2; 253/687 (36.8%)) on color Doppler examination. The original ultrasound examiner correctly classified 91.1% (626/687) of serous cystadenomas as benign and suggested the correct specific diagnosis in 51.5% (354/687) of tumors. For mucinous cystadenomas, the median diameter of the largest tumor was 93 (range, 12-550) mm. Most mucinous cystadenomas were described as unilateral (594/631 (94.1%)) with multilocular morphology (357/631 (56.6%)), and most manifested low-level echogenicity (334/631 (52.9%)). Most mucinous cystadenomas were poorly (color score of 2; 248/631 (39.3%)) or moderately (color score of 3; 194/631 (30.7%)) vascularized on color Doppler examination. The original ultrasound examiner correctly classified 87.5% (552/631) of mucinous cystadenomas as benign and suggested the correct specific diagnosis in 42.9% (271/631) of tumors. Based on pattern recognition (review of ultrasound images available for 433 tumors), the most typical sonographic features of serous cystadenomas were unilocular cyst (100/211 (47.4%)) or multilocular cyst with < 10 cyst locules (71/211 (33.6%)), whereas the typical features of mucinous cystadenomas were multilocular cyst with < 10 cyst locules (99/222 (44.6%)), unilocular cyst (78/222 (35.1%)) or multilocular cyst with > 10 cyst locules (31/222 (14.0%)). A honeycomb nodule was found in some mucinous cystadenomas (31/222 (14.0%)) but was not found in serous cystadenomas.

conclusionsSerous and mucinous cystadenomas exhibit typical sonographic features, allowing ultrasound examiners to assign a correct specific diagnosis to most tumors. Recognizing the ultrasound features of cystadenomas and avoiding misdiagnosing them as malignant can help prevent surgery for these benign tumors in asymptomatic patients. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Cystadenoma, MucinousCystadenoma, SerousOvarian NeoplasmsAdnexa UteriAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographycystadenomaovarian neoplasmovaryultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID40418494
PMCPMC12317306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.