ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after cataract surgery with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens for coexisting Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and cataract.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) staged after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with coexisting Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and cataract. STUDY
designRetrospective, interventional case series
methodsWe enrolled six eyes of three patients with coexisting FECD and cataract (3 women, age 67.8 ± 6.5 years) treated with presbyopia-correcting IOL implantation, followed by DMEK. The modified Krachmer grade, visual outcomes, and incidence of intra- and postoperative complications were analyzed.
resultsModified Krachmer FECD grades 4, 5, and 6 were observed in one, two, and three eyes, respectively. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was dissatisfactory with the primary presbyopia-correcting IOL (decimal 0.45), it improved significantly (decimal 1.0, P = 0.027) after DMEK and all eyes acquired satisfactory uncorrected distance and near (30 cm) vision (mean, decimal, distance 0.85 and near 0.56). The manifest spherical equivalent after DMEK was within the acceptable range (-0.375 D to 0.0 D). Rebubbling was required in four eyes, but no instances of other postoperative complications or primary graft failure were encountered.
conclusionDMEK staged after implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs is a viable option for patients with coexisting FECD and cataract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40418490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.