Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418482›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Assessing DNA Damage Through the Cell Cycle Using Flow Cytometry.

Ilham Alshiraihi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ilham AlshiraihiMycobacteria Research Laboratories, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. ailham@rams.colostate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining genomic integrity is essential for cellular health and the prevention of genetic disorders, including cancer. When DNA damage is left unrepaired, it can lead to mutations that disrupt key cellular processes and promote disease progression. This chapter outlines a comprehensive protocol for assessing DNA damage across different stages of the cell cycle using flow cytometry-a powerful technique for quantitatively analyzing both cell cycle distribution and DNA damage markers. Key phases of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2, and M) are examined, with emphasis on DNA damage checkpoints and the repair mechanisms that preserve genomic stability. Cells utilize multiple repair pathways, including direct reversal, base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), and double-strand break repair (DSBR). The protocol includes detailed steps for cell synchronization, DNA damage induction using agents such as UV light or hydrogen peroxide, and flow cytometric analysis following propidium iodide (PI) staining. Step-by-step procedures for cell culture, synchronization, fixation, staining, and data interpretation are provided. By enabling precise quantification of DNA damage and detection of cell cycle arrest, this method advances our understanding of DNA repair dynamics and genomic stability-offering critical applications in cancer research, genetic disease studies, and the development of targeted therapies and diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNA DamageFlow CytometryCell Cycle CheckpointsDNA RepairGenomic InstabilityHumansUltraviolet RaysCell cycleCell cycle synchronizationFlow cytometry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.