Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418481›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Chemical-Induced DNA Damage Identification by High-Throughput Detection of DNA Double-Strand Break.

Shigeaki Sunada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shigeaki SunadaJuntendo Advanced Research Institute for Health Science, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. s.sunada.gu@juntendo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous chemicals cause diverse types of DNA damage in cells. However, the failure of DNA repair associated with the formation of these lesions converts the diverse forms of DNA damage into the more severe form of damage, the DNA double-strand break (DSB). The DSB is also considered an early factor in the carcinogenic process. Therefore, analytical methods for detecting DSBs can contribute to the detection of carcinogenic chemicals. γH2AX has been widely used as a highly sensitive marker for DSB, and analytical methods using flow cytometry have excellent quantitative properties. I further attempted to simplify and expedite the method while maintaining its quantitative performance and established a high-throughput DSB quantification method. In this section, I present a simple method for evaluating the DNA damage potential of chemicals in terms of DSB formation.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysDNADNA RepairFlow CytometryHistonesHumansDNAH2AX protein, humanHistonesDNA-damaging agentDNA double-strand breakFlow cytometryγH2AX

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.