ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
A registry-based modified IDEAL stage 2b evaluation of urological procedures performed using the versius robotic surgical system.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety of Ovine Forestomach Matrix Across 474 Soft Tissue Defects: Interim Results from the Prospective Multicenter MASTRR Registry.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The IDEAL stage 1/2a study demonstrated feasibility of the use of the Versius robotic platform at a single institution. This multi-center collaborative modified stage 2b study adds wider exploration assessing surgical, oncologic and functional outcomes in patients undergoing urological procedures with the Versius. Data were collected from a prospective registry. Surgical outcomes were cross-checked from electronic patient records held at each hospital included in the study. All UK-based centers performing urological procedures using the Versius robot. All patients who underwent a robotic procedure using the Versius robot since inception to Jan 2023. Five UK hospitals have undertaken a total of 70 urological procedures using the Versius (Table 1). Device failure occurred in one of the cases requiring conversion to laparoscopy and a further case required conversion to open due to intra-operative complication (2/70, 2.9%). One positive margin was observed in a robotic prostatectomy patient (12.5%). Immediate continence was achieved in 4 of 8 (50%) after prostatectomy. Eight patients (11.4%) had complications within 30 days, and three were Clavien-Dindo class 3 and one class 4. A range of urological procedures were shown to be feasible and safe using the Versius across multiple sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.