Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418425›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2025

Biodegradable internal stent versus no stent for patients at increased risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.

Michele Mazzola, Andrea Zironda, Alessandro Giani, Carlotta Bellomo, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Pietro Calcagno, Michele Paterno, Giovanni Ferrari

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele MazzolaDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy. micmazzola@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-197X
Andrea ZirondaDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro GianiDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta BellomoBicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre-B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Davide Paolo BernasconiBicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre-B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Pietro CalcagnoDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
Michele PaternoDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni FerrariDivision of Minimally-Invasive Surgical Oncology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is considered the main trigger for further dangerous sequelae following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study compared the short-term postoperative results of patients at increased risk of POPF undergoing pancreaticojejunal (PJ) anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent. Data from a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing PD at increased risk of POPF (ISGPS type B, C, D) between January 2017 and June 2023 were retrieved and analyzed, comparing the postoperative outcomes of those with and without an internal biodegradable stent, using a propensity score matching analysis. In the study period, 183 patients were selected. After matching, a total of 59 with stent (SG) and 59 without (NSG) were compared. The overall POPF rate was 21.2%. No difference was seen between the groups regarding POPF and other postoperative outcomes. A higher rate of biochemical leakage in the SG (53.1% vs 31.9%, p 0.033) was found among patients in the type D class of risk. The present study showed no significant difference in terms of 90-day overall, severe and pancreas-specific postoperative complications among patients at increased risk of POPF who received PJ anastomosis with and without internal biodegradable stent.

Indexed as

Absorbable ImplantsPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsStentsAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreaticojejunostomyPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeInternal stentMitigation strategyPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative pancreatic fistula

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.